The aricle below is an August 18 editorial in progressive South African magazine Amandla.
* * *
No event since the end of Apartheid sums up the shallowness of the transformation in this country like the Marikana massacre.
What occurred will be debated for years. It is already clear the mineworkers will be blamed for being violent. The mineworkers will be painted as savages.
Yet, the fact is that heavily armed police with live ammunition brutally shot and killed over 35 mineworkers. Many more are injured. Some will die of their wounds. Another 10 workers were killed just prior to this massacre.
This was not the action of rogue cops. This massacre was a result of decisions taken at the top of the police structures. The police had promised to respond with force and came armed with live ammunition.
They behaved no better than the apartheid police when facing the Sharpeville, 1976 Soweto uprisings and 1980s protests where many of our people were killed.
The aggressive and violent response to community service delivery protests by the police have their echo and reverberation in this massacre.
This represents a bloodstain on the new South Africa.
This represents a failure of leadership. It is a failure of leadership from government: its ministers of labour and minerals resources who have been absent during this entire episode; its minister of police who maintains this is not political but a mere labour dispute and defends the action of the police; a failure of the president who can only issue platitudes in the face of this crisis and not mobilise the government and its tremendous resources to immediately address the concerns of the mineworkers and now their bereaved family members.
It has been a failure and betrayal of the Lonmin mine management that refused to follow through on undertakings to union leaders to meet the workers and address their grievances. The management summersaults between agreeing to negotiate with workers and then reneges saying they have an existing two-year agreement with National Union of Mineworkers (NUM).
It is unfortunately also a failure of the union leadership. In the first instance of the NUM, which regards any opposition to their leadership as criminal and asserts that such opposition must necessarily be a creation of the Chamber of Mines. This is obviously not true.
It is also a failure of the leadership of Association of Mining and Construction Union (AMCU), which acts opportunistically in an effort to recruit disgruntled NUM members, mobilises workers on unrealistic demands and fails to condemn the violence of its members.
The level of violence at our mines demonstrates the deep divisions within and polarisation of South African society. Mineworkers are employed in extreme conditions of poverty, often living in squalor in squatter camps without basic services.
The mineworkers are often employed through labour brokers and informally without decent work conditions.
The “wildcat strike” (like other similar strikes on the mines) that set off the events leading to the slaughter is a response to the structural violence of South Africa's system of mining. However, it is also a response to something else, which we dare not ignore.
Enriched mineowners with the experience of co-option see an opportunity of driving a wedge between “reasonable” union leaders and the workers. They entice the unions into sweetheart relations dividing them from the worker rank-and-files.
The anger at the mines is a deep-seated anger at mine management, which is progressively being directed at the compliance and failure of their union leadership to defend and represent worker interests.
The alienation between union members and the unions' leadership is a factor behind what has happened at Lonmin and what is happening at other Platinum mines.
Nevertheless, the slaughter of more than 35 mineworkers is a result of the violence of the state, specifically the police. At the very least police minister Nathi Mthethwa must take responsibility and resign.