Senate to probe Middle Arm Development Precinct

September 15, 2023
Issue 
Image: Green Left

The Northern Territory Labor government’s claims that the Middle Arm Development Precinct will be sustainable and that it is not subsiding fossil fuels will be held up to scrutiny now that a Senate inquiry has finally been established.

Resources and infrastructure minister Madeleine King claims the government’s $1.5 billion stake in Middle Arm, described as a “sustainable development precinct” is “not a subsidy for fossil fuels” but “an important way of setting up our economy for a sustainable future”.

Located on a peninsula south of Darwin, the precinct is being touted by Labor as a “global-first” sustainable project, “largely powered by renewables”.

It is being marketed as a world-class industrial precinct with a focus on renewable hydrogen, advanced manufacturing, carbon capture and storage and minerals processing.

Its website states: “The Territory, Australia and our region need the Precinct in order to transition to renewable energy and achieve net zero by 2050.”

The NT has also committed to “no net increase” in emissions from fracking.

But a briefing document for environment minister Tanya Plibersek describes the project as central to the expansion of the gas industry in the Beetaloo Basin gas industry.

Documents obtained by the ABC last year show the original business case described it as a “new gas demand centre”.

The NT government submitted its Growing Advanced Manufacturing in the Northern Territory's Middle Arm Industrial Precinct business case to Infrastructure Australia in September 2020 in an attempt to secure federal funding.

After several failed attempts to set up a parliamentary investigation, Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young won support for one, when Labor backflipped on September 5.

The inquiry was recommended in a report from an earlier Senate inquiry that examined the Beetaloo Basin.

The Guardian reported the inquiry will focus on the likely and intended future uses of Middle Arm, funding from the federal and Northern Territory governments and the project’s impacts on the climate, health and cultural heritage.

“In the middle of the climate crisis, Anthony Albanese is continuing Scott Morrison’s gas-fired recovery with $1.5 billion of taxpayer money to subsidise gas export and petrochemicals 3km away from the suburbs of Darwin,” Hanson-Young said.

“Gas fuels the climate crisis and taxpayers should not be subsidising its dangerous expansion. Greenwashing gas and ‘petrochemicals’ as renewables means this entire project requires closer scrutiny.”

Independent ACT Senator David Pocock welcomed the inquiry, saying it was a win for communities.

“The government is investing $1.5 billion in taxpayer funds to enable a gas processing hub on Darwin Harbour, just 3 kilometres from Darwin’s suburbs. This goes against expert climate and health advice.”

University of New South Wales researchers said in August it is not credible to describe the precinct, which includes a gas plant, as “sustainable”.

They said the planned low-emissions projects “rely on highly speculative technologies” including a carbon-capture and storage facility — unproven technology.

Claims that Middle Arm would be substantially powered by renewable energy are in doubt, as one solar project that was planning a giant battery went into administration this year.

There are also questions about two proposed green hydrogen projects, as neither company has ever built one.

The UNSW researchers criticised the decarbonisation plan for relying on carbon credits.

“Carbon offsets are contentious because they allow companies to keep pumping out carbon. And ensuring carbon credits represent genuine emissions reduction can be difficult.”

Climate activists and First Nations groups also criticised the development.

Frack Free NT spokesperson Phil Scott said: “This confirms what groups like ours have been saying since day one — that the government-provided $1.5 billion for the Middle Arm Precinct will be a taxpayer-funded subsidy for fracking companies like Tamboran.”

According to GetUp!: “At this rate, frackers like Tamboran Resources will be able to turn millions of tonnes of water into toxic fracking wastewater, leaving remote communities without access to the very thing that gives them life.”

Tamboran intends to develop a fracked gas facility initially capable of producing 6.6 million tonnes of liquefied natural gas a year, with potential for expansion.

Other companies have secured land at Middle Arm for various projects, including green hydrogen and ammonia production, critical minerals processing, and battery production. Fortescue Future Industries, led by mining magnate Andrew Forrest, is among those planning green hydrogen and ammonia facilities.

The NT government said more than 20 other companies have expressed interest in building at Middle Arm.

“What have they got to hide?” WA Greens Senator Dorinda Cox asked in the Senate on August 9. The Senate inquiry aims to find that out.

Meanwhile, a delegation of Mudburra, Jingili and Manggarayi people shared their deep concerns about fracking, climate change and the over-extraction of water in the NT with MPs at Parliament House on September 14.

They called on the government to protect water and respect and listen to the cultural knowledge of water systems that First Nations people carry.

You need Green Left, and we need you!

Green Left is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.