Evil Muslim swimming plot exposed

August 28, 2010
Issue 
There’s a section of the US that hates Muslims, and Republican leaders like Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich are delighted to lea

To give yourself a stressful and futile day, try telling people there are no plans to build a mosque at Ground Zero.

You’ll get nowhere, although the truth is there are plans to build an Islamic centre, with a swimming pool open to everyone, two blocks away from Ground Zero site of the September 11, 2001 attack on the Twin Towers in New York.

So if this is a continuation of the terrorist agenda as claimed, it’s been a peculiar plan, and Bin Laden must have started by telling his followers: “First we will destroy their buildings — and then, oo it’s so deliciously evil, we will get people to swim near to where the buildings were ... mwaHAHAHAHAHA.”

The centre will include a memorial to victims of the attack on the towers, but even so Sarah Palin has called upon “peaceful Muslims” to reject the building. So, as she’s asking Muslims to oppose a centre open to everyone, and that commemorates the victims of 9/11, it seems likely she’s a militant Jihadist who thinks the building will be a betrayal of true radical Islam.

She’s certainly got experience of being filmed with rifles so she’s probably sat by one while making a video up a mountain, leaning into the camera and booming: “The front crawl is the agenda of the infidel, my friends.”

The centre will also include a basketball court, but that doesn’t convince these people because it won’t be proper basketball, it will be Muslim basketball, and there’s bound to have been some senator on Fox News howling: “We’ve got to ask ourselves why these guys want to learn an American sport like this.

“Now, you imagine you’ve got the tallest Muslims learning to jump up high, next time you want to bring down a tower you don’t have to fly planes to do it, you just get these guys to jump up with whatever bomb they've smuggled in through Mexico and whack, you’ve got 5 million dead.”

And it’s two blocks away, which in Manhattan is another district. So how far away is it permissible to be Muslim? Maybe there needs to be specific guidelines, for example three blocks before you can whistle anything by Cat Stevens, five blocks away before you can stop eating during Ramadan and so on, so as not to offend the families of the victims.

One persistent argument of those who oppose the mosque that isn’t a mosque on Ground Zero that won’t be on Ground Zero is that Ground Zero should remain a special place of sombre tranquillity.

So instead of this centre there should be more buildings such as The Pussycat Club, which is next door to where the towers were, and boasts of being the area’s premier strip joint.

But that must be in keeping with the sombreness, presumably because the women start their slide down the pole in a fireman’s uniform in honour of the heroic firefighters of that fateful day.

Then there are the salesmen who hover round Ground Zero. As you contemplate the poignancy of the site, someone from this franchise stands soulfully by you, taps your shoulder and opens a leather-bound collection of photos of the Twin Towers on fire.

“Hi, I’m offering souvenirs of 9/11”, I was told when I was there. What are you supposed to say to that? Are you meant to go: “Oo yes, you’ve caught the contrast between the fire and the clouds on that one, what a delightful shade of crimson?”

So wait until Fox News and the Tea Party hear about that level of dishonouring the victims. Oo they’ll be cross.

A philosophical argument against the new building came from Mark Williams, chairperson and spokesperson for the Tea Party, who said: “The mosque would be for the worship of the terrorists’ monkey god.”

He appears to have mixed up Islam with Hinduism, so it may be when he finds that out he’ll change his mind, and say: “Oh it’s Hindus with the monkey god. Silly me, well in that case go ahead with the mosque, it's Hindus I have a problem with, it’s all to do with being squeamish about monkeys.”

Similarly, Newt Gingrich, who hopes to be Republican candidate for president, said: “The folks who want to build this mosque are radical Islamists.”

And this is where they’re more honest, because they seem to believe all Muslims are terrorists. In which case, they don’t really care where a mosque or Islamic centre is built, just as if the Continuity IRA applied for planning permission to build an explosives-testing plant, you wouldn’t say: “Well alright but not if it’s less than half a mile from Canterbury Cathedral as that would be insensitive.”

So there have been protests across the US against mosques, in places such as Tennessee and Wisconsin. Presumably the argument there is: “Imagine if someone who was in the Twin Towers on 9/11 was still so traumatised that they sleepwalked, and by chance one night they dreamily ambled into Grand Central station and got a train to Wisconsin and got out and wandered through the state and woke up just as they were by the new mosque, well it could be quite a shock.”

More likely is there’s a section of the US that hates Muslims, and those like Palin and Gingrich are delighted to lead them. According to the latest survey, 24% of Americans believes that Barack Obama is Muslim, and the Tea Party politicians promote that nonsense.

Obama seems willing to try and placate characters such as Palin, but he might be better off saying: “Alright then — nothing Islamic near Ground Zero, but that principle applies to everything.

“So every Catholic Church within two blocks of a school is being shut down, as it would be grossly insensitive to allow an institution with such a record of child abuse to worship near its victims.

“We’re withdrawing every branch of McDonalds and Starbucks from Vietnam, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama or anywhere else we’ve ever bombed, and we’re telling Wall Street that it has to move to New Jersey, as the Twin Towers were called the World Trade Center and the bankers were the ones that stopped the global economy in it’s tracks.”

[Reprinted from Marksteelinfo.com.]

Comments

Let's look at it this way. How do you think WWII would have went if we hadn't "lowered" ourselves by identifying and dealing w/ Nazis in the states. Say we let them build a Nazi recruitment center here in the 40s, using the same arguments that some of the ppl on here are using: that "if we didn't allow it, we'd be lowering ourselves to their level," or that "it'd go against what we stand for as Americans." Those make sense and sound nice, but also aren't the best option to take against an aggressive invader, who views itself as "conquering" non muslim nations. And for the people who have been saying that persecuting all Christians because of a radical minority such as the KKK is the same thing, it's not. It doesn't say anywhere in the bible to wear white pajamas and kill every non white person living in the US. However, it's a fundamental part of the Quran to "Fight against such as those to whom the Scriptures were given (Jews and Christians)... until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued." (Surah 9:27). And we have all the "Good Muslims" claiming that they don't follow those parts, but do you really think that's how they all feel? What do you think they'll tell another Muslim if asked the same question, especially when it says directly in their little book to persecute any Muslims who don't follow the Quran entirely (http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/koran.html has a good list of quotes like this). As far as I'm concerned, the Quran is one of the most dangerous/fundamentally misogynistic and intolerant pieces of crap to ever be written, let alone mass produced. How can you even pretend to take a nation seriously who is using its women as human bombers by putting bombs in their breast implants (breast augmentation bomb pics). It's not pretty sounding, but we need to at least regulate the spread of this toxic ideology before they become even more entrenched in the countries they're "invading." It's either compromise our values or let them carry out their agenda, so I'd choose the lesser of the two.
Starting withthe Nazi anaolgy is interesting. Because if you read Nazi propaganda, you will find it very close in tone and logic to what you have jsut written - only with the word "Jews" instead of "Muslims".
http://www.cracked.com/article_18911_5-ridiculous-things-you-probably-believe-about-islam_p2.html

You need Green Left, and we need you!

Green Left is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.