The rhetoric of homophobia is changing in our society. Those on the conservative side of the debate no longer make any mention of the Bible, morality or mental health. Instead, they claim they are motivated by love to oppress gay people.
Recently, I sat in the NSW legislative council (in which Reverend Fred Nile, MLC, is the honorary chaplain of the house) and watched the debate on marriage equality.
The motion by Greens MLC Cate Faehrmann was a symbolic gesture, really. It wouldn’t change any laws, but it did call upon the federal parliament to grant marriage equality. The success of the motion has meant that every parliament in Australia has supported marriage equality, except of course in Canberra’s federal parliament, where such laws are made.
What fascinated me more than anything was a complete lack of any mention by the conservatives of homosexuality being morally wrong, sinful or pathological. Several conservative MLCs expressed their outrage that the mover of the motion used the word “homophobia”. It is deeply hurtful to be called homophobic, they said:
• We are “so hurt that you would suggest we are homophobic”. The Macquarie Dictionary defines homophobia as fear and hate. I don’t fear or hate anyone.
• I had so many “gay friends around my Christmas table” this year. I have such respect for them that I could not vote against this motion unless I truly believed that they are completely equal already, without marriage rights.
• I simply believe with all my heart that “marriage is about procreation”, and gay people don’t have the “correct biological makeup” to do that.
• I have gone on such an “amazing personal journey” to the point where I now love and respect homosexual persons. I have even disagreed with my own priest on this issue. But I simply can’t get over “the Macquarie Dictionary definition of marriage”. It says “boys and girls only”. In the DICTIONARY.
I too have a lot of friends on the other side of the argument, and I could clothe my argument here in the language of love. But I think it is more respectful to speak from your true motives.
I know your moral journey is an authentic and genuine one, but I do not want it to play out in the world of my rights.
So I want to change the definition, not of marriage, but of homophobia. I want to change it to: “any kind of love, respect, genuineness, compassion or personal growth that makes people want to take away the rights of homosexual people.”
[Rev. Karl Hand is pastor of CRAVE Metropolitan Community Church and a member of Sydney’s Community Action Against Homophobia.]
Comments
Anonymous replied on Permalink